Gnome – can it last?

Every time a new GNOME release comes out, I’m tempted, and I usually wind up installing the damn thing. I’ve always been disappointed – there are usually enough crash bugs and annoyances that I go right back to a light WM. Not to allow any exceptions, I installed gnome 2.10 yesterday and have been giving it a proper test.

First impression – it’s a much better release than previous ones, i.e. 2.6 and 2.8, which I found to be too buggy to be usable. I’ve only noticed one crash bug so far, and it doesn’t take down gnome, just causes some unresponsiveness and kills an applet (the System Monitor’s “harddisk” applet). Some small annoyances include Nautilus not using mouse buttons 4 and 5 for back/forward like firefox, which should just need some imwheel lovin’, and some inconsistency in audio – for instance, getting Nautilus to do audio previews is currently being a bitch.

It’s more cohesive than a WM, which I suppose is the idea. I’m a fairly knowledgeable FVWM user, meaning I have a tweaked config that does exactly what I want, so gnome’s relative stiffness will take some getting used to – but I like the fact that it’s a designed system rather than a cobbled-together app heap. That’s a hard thing to describe; it’s something like the engineering behind OSX, though I couldn’t ever see myself using that. Things fit a little better together, while not being as… kute as KDE. Whether this will last will probably depend on fixing my few issues and finding out just how customizable this thing is for someone as anal as I am.

Comments

One response to “Gnome – can it last?”

  1. redshift Avatar

    Poor GNOME, it never lasts.

    It’s just never customizable enough, and frankly, their developers don’t know good defaults from a hole in the ground.

    I tried GNOME 2.12 recently, and it lasted an even shorter time than 2.10. Honestly, I couldn’t tell you what had changed. Sure, they have a “What’s New” page, but it doesn’t affect anything real.

    The true improvement in 2.12, or rather, in its libraries, are the great additional applications it allows. Two good examples are beagle and evince. Beagle, when it works properly, which isn’t to say “yet”, changes how you think about your files somewhat. In a good way. Evince, which I haven’t seen work badly but is still rather beta, is exactly what every other PDF reader hasn’t been – light, accurate, sufficient, and free.

    So, I wound up with just about every GNOME library there is, but no GNOME. FVWM for me. Nothing ever seems to compare.

    Like

Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s