<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Keyrings Larger than Two Men</title>
	<atom:link href="http://halffull.org/2005/01/14/keyrings-larger-than-two-men/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://halffull.org/2005/01/14/keyrings-larger-than-two-men/</link>
	<description>distributed humor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 06:08:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: redshift</title>
		<link>http://halffull.org/2005/01/14/keyrings-larger-than-two-men/comment-page-1/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>redshift</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2005 17:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://halffull.org/2005/01/14/keyrings-larger-than-two-men/#comment-158</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The lock would need microprocessor just fast enough to approve the private key, and an RFID (or similar) transmitter to receive and send.  That&#039;d be cheap, and a lot of people would be willing to pay considering that it&#039;s up to the individual to use - in other words, having an electronic lock on your home door wouldn&#039;t impact anyone else, and it wouldn&#039;t impact your access to anyone else&#039;s locks.  It wouldn&#039;t be up to &lt;em&gt;everyone&lt;/em&gt; to implement, just the people who want the added convenience and security.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There wouldn&#039;t be any problems with adoption because it&#039;d be cheap to install on your home, and that&#039;s pretty much the main concern.  The only adoption delay might be with cars, because I can see car manufacturers slacking off for a while on something like this, even if it were a standard.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The only problem left is security - let&#039;s face it, no door lock is going to stop a determined thief/criminal.  Nothing will.  They can saw through your door or wall, or just smash a window if they like.  Electronic locks would just make everything more convenient and secure for 99% of issues.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lock would need microprocessor just fast enough to approve the private key, and an RFID (or similar) transmitter to receive and send.  That&#8217;d be cheap, and a lot of people would be willing to pay considering that it&#8217;s up to the individual to use &#8211; in other words, having an electronic lock on your home door wouldn&#8217;t impact anyone else, and it wouldn&#8217;t impact your access to anyone else&#8217;s locks.  It wouldn&#8217;t be up to <em>everyone</em> to implement, just the people who want the added convenience and security.</p>

<p>There wouldn&#8217;t be any problems with adoption because it&#8217;d be cheap to install on your home, and that&#8217;s pretty much the main concern.  The only adoption delay might be with cars, because I can see car manufacturers slacking off for a while on something like this, even if it were a standard.</p>

<p>The only problem left is security &#8211; let&#8217;s face it, no door lock is going to stop a determined thief/criminal.  Nothing will.  They can saw through your door or wall, or just smash a window if they like.  Electronic locks would just make everything more convenient and secure for 99% of issues.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://halffull.org/2005/01/14/keyrings-larger-than-two-men/comment-page-1/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2005 15:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://halffull.org/2005/01/14/keyrings-larger-than-two-men/#comment-157</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think your forgetting the cost to make the locks, and the cost of EVERYONE implementing those locks. I&#039;m sure it will happen, or at least something similar, but it&#039;s going to take a bit longer, no one want&#039;s to put out the money nor trust their security to &lt;em&gt;cough&lt;/em&gt; a computer.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think your forgetting the cost to make the locks, and the cost of EVERYONE implementing those locks. I&#8217;m sure it will happen, or at least something similar, but it&#8217;s going to take a bit longer, no one want&#8217;s to put out the money nor trust their security to <em>cough</em> a computer.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.641 seconds -->

