Juvenile vs. Adult Trials

In Texas and Florida, two fine conservative states, many juvenile criminals are sentenced and tried as adults. This leads to longer sentencing; a murder, such as the one mentioned in the Title IX case, could lead to life imprisonment if tried and sentenced under adult penalties rather than to 3-4 years in juvenile incerceration. In other states, like Maryland, for example, young criminals are tried and sentenced as juveniles, and they serve their time in facilities that are geared specifically toward rehabilitation.

So what’s the issue? I don’t understand why the disparity in sentencing is so great between states. (In the case of the young man who had a violent history and stabbed his girlfriend to death in school, I thought 3-4 years was not long enough in prison. This is probably gender bias on my part.) Interestingly enough, the young man in question committed his crime in Texas, but was tried as a juvenile. Usually Texan juvenile criminals are tried as adults. Why was that not the case in this situation?

So where a young person commits a crime can have a vast effect on the rest of their life. The moral of the story, I guess, is if you’re going to stab someone, do it in a liberal state.